Why Trump agreed to ceasefire with Houthis that ignores Israel, root causes
Despite heavy bombardment, the Houthis retained significant missile and drone capabilities, adapted tactically, inflicted a $1 billion cost on US and emerged more strategically valuable to Iran.
In a quiet but consequential diplomatic development, the United States agreed this week to halt its air campaign against Yemen’s Ansarullah movement — also known as the Houthis — in exchange for an end to attacks on international shipping in the Red Sea and Bab el Mandeb Strait. The deal, brokered by Oman and reportedly facilitated by Iran, was announced by President Donald Trump on Tuesday, just days before his first overseas tour of the Gulf since returning to office.
Described by the US president as a “capitulation" on the part of the Houthis, the ceasefire is, in fact, a loosely defined verbal understanding — there is no written agreement. And while the Houthis have confirmed they will not target US assets, they remain committed to military operations against Israel. This ambiguity reflects a broader pattern: tactical de-escalation balanced by strategic messaging.
A deal with limited terms but wide implications
The outlines of the ceasefire emerged through Omani and Iranian channels. At its core lies a transactional quid pro quo: The Houthis would halt attacks on commercial vessels, and the United States would suspend strikes in Yemen. Though limited in scope, the deal has created regional ripples, particularly in maritime security and energy markets. Trump framed the Houthi message as, “Please do not bomb us anymore, and we are not going to attack your ships.” In response, the United States paused Operation Rough Rider, which, since March 15, has struck over 1,000 targets — including weapons storage sites, drone infrastructure and command centers — killing hundreds of fighters and midlevel leaders.
