Skip to main content

Turkish Parliament Faces Deadline On Draft Constitution

Cornered by Prime Minister Erdogan's electoral calendar, Cemil Cicek announced a deadline for the Parliamentary Constitution Reconciliation Commission to finalize its work, writes Tulin Daloglu.

Turkey's Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan leaves his seat to address members of parliament from the ruling AK Party (AKP) during a meeting at the Turkish parliament in Ankara February 19, 2013. REUTERS/Umit Bektas (TURKEY - Tags: POLITICS) - RTR3DZE4
Turkey's Prime Minister Tayyip Recep Erdogan leaves his seat to address members of parliament from the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) during a meeting at the Turkish parliament in Ankara, Feb. 19, 2013. — REUTERS/Umit Bektas

“The sun is about to set, we need to make a decision before it gets dark,” Cemil Cicek, speaker of the Turkish Parliament and member of the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) said today [May 3], as the Erdogan government’s patience runs thin in trying to persuade the members of the parliament’s Constitution Reconciliation Commission (CRC) to forge a new contract between the state and the citizens — as the AKP sees fit.

The 12 CRC members started their work to draft a new constitution in May 2012. This historic parliamentary commission is composed of three deputies from each elected party — AKP, Republican People’s Party (CHP), Nationalist Movement Party (MHP) and the pro-Kurdish Peace and Democracy Party (BDP).

While they have been able to reach consensus on 39 articles so far, the number of articles disagreed on far exceed that. The opposition claims that Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s desire to change the parliamentary system into a presidential one has emerged as a stumbling bloc in their negotiations. The AKP side suggests that they are not really insisting on this issue, but could also propose a semi-presidential system, Turkish-style.

In February 2013, the CHP proposed to the CRC to hear from the Council of Europe’s advisory body — known as the Venice Commission — on constitutional matters to find a way out of this impasse, but it was turned down. The AKP, MHP and BDP argued that this new constitution should be a “national one” and foreign powers or bodies would not be allowed to interfere. Today’s Zaman reminded us on Feb. 25, however, that the AKP did seek the Venice Commission’s involvement in a constitutional reform approved on Sept. 12, 2010, saying its partners are states, not political parties.

SUBSCRIBER EXCLUSIVE

Continue reading this exclusive analysis

Original reporting and analysis unavailable elsewhere. Subscribe to AL-MONITOR to read this story and access everything we publish