Skip to main content

Israel warms to Abbas as Gaza mediator

The reconciliation between the PLO and Hamas may give Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas the standing to negotiate with both Hamas and Israel.

Turkey's President Abdullah Gul (R) and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas attend a news conference following their meeting at Ataturk International airport in Istanbul July 18, 2014. A portrait of modern Turkey's founder Ataturk is in the background. REUTERS/Murad Sezer (TURKEY - Tags: POLITICS) - RTR3Z8NN
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas attends a news conference in Istanbul, July 18, 2014. — REUTERS/Murad Sezer

The role of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas as a possible mediator and guarantor of any long-term Hamas-Israeli cease-fire has returned to the forefront of current diplomatic discussions. Abbas’ political resurrection is more the result of there being no other credible mediator than something of his own doing. What appears to have been the main cause of the war on Gaza — the reconciliation between the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and Hamas — now appears to offer the potential to end the Israeli assault on the Palestinians.

The major problem facing Israel and the international community is that they need the acquiescence of the Islamic movement for any sustained cease-fire, yet they refuse, for political reasons to communicate, recognize or seriously engage with Hamas. The problem began when the Egyptian government, which has a peace treaty with Israel, offered a cease-fire agreement to Hamas via the media — that is, without even consulting the Gaza-based group. Under President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, Egypt has blamed Hamas for the security troubles Cairo faces in the Sinai Peninsula and has been reluctant to lend Hamas the credibility it needs for a truce and vouch for or give any long-term guarantees about Hamas to the Israelis.

Other possible guarantors, such as Qatar and Turkey, have been rejected by Israel. Israel’s foreign minister, Avigdor Liberman, viciously attacked the Qataris and called for banning their flagship satellite station, Al Jazeera. As for Turkey — which has yet to fully restore ties with Israel after the killing of nine of its citizens by the Israeli navy in the 2010 Mavi Marmara incident — Ankara has been rejected because of, among other things, statements by Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan referring to Israeli actions in Gaza as “more barbaric than Hitler.”

The United States was also considered as a mediator, but like Egypt, its hands are tied by its own national legislation, which in the Americans' case has considered Hamas a terrorist organization since 1997. Regardless, Washington, which has publicly supported Israel, would not be able to convince Hamas that it can be a neutral mediator.

SUBSCRIBER EXCLUSIVE

Continue reading this exclusive analysis

Original reporting and analysis unavailable elsewhere. Subscribe to AL-MONITOR to read this story and access everything we publish