Skip to main content

New Iran bill doesn’t mandate up-or-down vote on nuclear deal

Legislation from the Senate Foreign Relations chairman would authorize — but not require — Congress to weigh in before sanctions can be lifted.

Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee Senator Bob Corker (R-TN) speaks to reporters about U.S. President Barack Obama's request to authorize military force against Islamic State, on Capitol Hill in Washington February 11, 2015.      REUTERS/Joshua Roberts    (UNITED STATES - Tags: POLITICS MILITARY CIVIL UNREST) - RTR4P8CN
Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Bob Corker, R-Tenn., speaks to reporters on Capitol Hill in Washington, Feb. 11, 2015. — REUTERS/Joshua Roberts

WASHINGTON — Legislation introduced the evening of Feb. 27 on Capitol Hill would enable — but not require — Congress to vote on an Iran nuclear deal.

The bill from Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Bob Corker, R-Tenn., creates a mechanism for an up-or-down vote but would allow sanctions relief to go forward if Congress doesn’t act, according to a copy obtained by Al-Monitor. It would also block any new sanctions relief beyond that agreed to in the November Joint Plan of Action for 60 days while Congress reviews the deal.

The White House has promised to veto such legislation, saying it would hamstring negotiators if Iran doesn’t think they can deliver on their commitment to lift sanctions.

In addition, the bill would require President Barack Obama to certify that any deal he reaches with Iran would only allow nuclear activities that meet US nonproliferation objectives and aren’t “inimical” to US national security. Going forward, it would force the president to report to Congress every six months on Iran’s nuclear program and its compliance with a final deal.

SUBSCRIBER EXCLUSIVE

Continue reading this exclusive analysis

Original reporting and analysis unavailable elsewhere. Subscribe to AL-MONITOR to read this story and access everything we publish