Skip to main content

Iran negotiator: Nuclear program limits will have 'time frame'

As Iran and the UN Security Council meet for the last round of nuclear talks, negotiators from Iran say that the final agreement will be temporary.

Iran's deputy Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi leaves the Conference on Security Policy in Munich February 4, 2006. The U.N. nuclear watchdog's board of governors voted on Saturday to report Iran to the U.N. Security Council over concerns Tehran is secretly seeking atomic weapons, a diplomat said.  REUTERS/Michael Dalder - RTR15UJ5
Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi leaves the Conference on Security Policy in Munich, Feb. 4, 2006. — REUTERS/Michael Dalder

As the July 20 deadline for the interim nuclear deal looms and negotiators meet for the sixth and final round of talks, nuclear negotiators from the United States and Iran have each taken a tough stance in front of their domestic audiences. In interviews and op-eds, the negotiators have painted a pessimistic but realistic picture of a final deal between Iran and the five permanent members of the UN Security Council plus Germany (P5+1).

“The final agreement will have a time frame, and this is something that has been referenced in Geneva,” Iranian nuclear negotiator and Deputy Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi told Iranian Students’ News Agency. “This time frame is one of the issues being negotiated.”

Araghchi said, “If we accept limitations for confidence building, it will be for a specific time frame and temporary.” He added, “None of our commitments are for eternity and they will not be permanent. Therefore, I emphasize and insist that our people not pay attention to the assumptions, which do not make clear with what intentions they are stated, especially those that come from foreign sources.”

In regard to the Arak heavy water reactor, a point of contention, Araghchi said, “What we recommended and what we still recommend is to preserve the nature of Arak, but with technical changes. With up-to-date technology, the concerns about having access to building a bomb can be eliminated or extremely lowered.”

SUBSCRIBER EXCLUSIVE

Continue reading this exclusive analysis

Original reporting and analysis unavailable elsewhere. Subscribe to AL-MONITOR to read this story and access everything we publish